“Trust the Science” was the crying scream from all governments globally, but why did they totally ignore all mask science and simply make up new science out of thin air. They also made up “6ft Social Distancing”, lockdowns, asymptomatic carriers and countless other “science”. Fauci was forced to admit in sworn testimony that they MADE UP almost all of their policies and they were not based on science at all.
UK health officials have admitted that the medical-grade masks that the government forced on everyone during COVID-19 are utterly ineffective at preventing illness. The “science” was a lie
A report detailing an investigation into the most widely used medical-grade masks during the “pandemic,” such as the N95, KN95, and FFP2 models, which public health authorities claimed would stop COVID “droplets” from spreading, was released by the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA).
At-risk populations, such as those with Down syndrome, certain cancer patients, and those with immune system disorders, were included in the data collection, which ran through September 2022.
Researchers examined 4,371 publications regarding COVID; not a single one discussed the efficacy of N95 or similar face masks. In fact, not a single piece of practical scientific evidence supporting the use of a medical-grade face covering as a COVID-19 preventive measure could be found by researchers at the end of their investigation.
“The review did not identify any studies for inclusion, and so could provide no evidence to answer the research question,” the authors stated. “No studies matching the inclusion criteria were found, so no evidence could be presented.”
(Related: Do you recall all of the statements made about “asymptomatic carriers” spreading COVID-19? Everything about it was false.)
Non-existent science of masks
As the mask debate raged, generally speaking, between the pro-mask left and the anti-mask right, as you are undoubtedly well aware. In America, it became common to associate wearing a mask with being a “Democrat,” while those who exposed their faces were typically associated with being “Republicans.”
The scientific and academic communities were divided on the issue as well; the more “progressive” participants favored masks and mask laws, while the more unconventional participants favored the right to breathe without restriction.
The actual science—which, as we now know, does not even exist—that was supposed to support mask wear was lost in the midst of the controversy. The UKHSA searched for it but was unable to locate it; furthermore, the UKHSA is an impartial organization that does not hold strong opinions regarding mask wear.
Carl Heneghan, a professor of evidence-based medicine at the University of Oxford, commented on the new research and told The Telegraph that it is “a significant failing” that no high-quality trials on the efficacy of masks have ever been carried out.
“I do not understand why there’s been a lack of will to do high-quality trials in this area,” he stated. “We have completely failed to address this issue and I actually consider that to be an issue that the [COVID] inquiry needs to look at.”
Recent Comments