Director of CDC, Rochelle Walensky warns of ADE, Antibody Dependent Enhancement From Israel Data

Posted on


Director of CDC, Rochelle Walensky Warns of ADE, Antibody Dependent Enhancement From Israel Data

According to Robert Malone, MD inventor of the mRNA vaccine technology, a dreaded adverse side effect of COVID-19 vaccines is ADE, Antibody Dependent Enhancement which has been described in animal studies.(29)(31)  This is the interaction of the immune system with the virus resulting in death of most of the vaccinated animals upon re-exposure to the virus. Obviously, this is not a good thing. (16-17)

ADE Explained: Two Types of Antibodies

In this scenario, there are two types of antibodies in the experimental animals.  The first type is the neutralizing antibodies and the second type is  the enhancing antibodies.  The neutralizing antibodies are preferred since they “neutralize” or completely eliminate the virus from the body.   The enhancing antibodies are the problem since they “enhance” entry of the virus into cells, enhancing viral replication and severity of the disease.  Enhancing antibodies do exactly the opposite of the intended effect of the vaccine.  Instead of protecting the animal, the vaccine makes the viral disease worse and kills the animal.(1-15)

Previous Failed Human Vaccine Trials

Previous human vaccines against RSV and Dengue virus resulted in failed vaccine trials because of ADE, Antibody Dependent Enhancement.  In the Philippines, failure of the Dengue vaccine program led to criminal charges for researchers.  830,000 children were given the “Dengvaxia”, Dengue virus vaccine, before the program was suspended in 2017. (11-13) Dr Wen Shi Lee writes in Nature Microbiology (2020):

Previous respiratory syncytial virus and dengue virus vaccine studies revealed human clinical safety risks related to ADE, resulting in failed vaccine trials. (3) Endquote Dr. Lee

So far, with the mRNA COVID 19 vaccine, we have not seen this ADE to any appreciable degree in the US. However, early data from Israel suggests ADE is starting to appear in the vaccinated population, those who received their vaccination the earliest.

What is the significance of receiving your vaccine the earliest ? Pfizer is now recommending a third booster shot after 6 months, admitting the vaccine induced antibody protection wanes after 6 months or so. (14-15) In Australia, Dr Kerry Chant is bluntly stating everyone will need to get a booster vaccine every 6 months “forever”.  This is an obvious admission of vaccine failure. Here is Zero Hedge quoting Dr Kerry Chant, the Australian Health Minister:

“Australian health chief Dr. Kerry Chant says that COVID will be with us “forever” and people will have to “get used to” taking endless booster vaccines.” end quote

Antibodies Wane After 6 Months

As antibodies wane, the patient is now at risk for viral infection after vaccination as we have been seeing with “break through” cases.  This is the predicted scenario for ADE, and prompted Pfizer to recommend a third booster shot to avoid catastrophic ADE, as was seen with the Dengue virus in the Philippines.(1-15)

Dr. Rochelle Walensky

Watch this video of CDC Director Rochelle Walensky who warns about ADE, or worsening disease in vaccinated individuals after re-exposure to the virus :

“Additionally, reports from our international colleagues, including Israel, suggest increased risk of severe disease amongst those vaccinated early.” Endquote Dr. Rochelle Walensky

Latest Public Health Service Data Suggests ADE is Occurring in Scotland

An article in Daily Expose 9/1/21 reviews public data from the Public Health Service of Scotland over the past 4 weeks shows alarming indication that ADE is occurring in the population of Scotland:

These are the Two Public Health reports from Scotland Aug 4 and Sept 1, 2021:

Public Health Scotland 21-08-04-covid19-publication_report

Public Health Scotland 21-09-01-covid19-publication_report

Publicly released data (above two pdf files) shows for last 4 weeks, the IFR (Infection Fatality Rate) in the fully vaccinated is 3.3 times that of the unvaccinated.  The risk of death if hospitalized for the fully vaccinated is 2.15 times that of the unvaccinated hospitalized for Covid. ( note: This is for most recent 4 weeks of data)

Here is a quote from the Daily Expose article:

“the unvaccinated account for just 25% of deaths in the last four weeks, (and that percentage has reduced in more recent weeks), the unvaccinated have a much lower chance of being hospitalised, a much lower chance of death if infected with Covid-19, and a much lower chance of death if hospitalised with Covid-19, and the Public Health Authorities are doing their best to hide it….

In the most recent four weeks 0.1% of confirmed cases among the unvaccinated population have resulted in death, whilst 0.33% of confirmed cases among the fully vaccinated population have resulted in death. Therefore, according to Public Health Scotland’s own data, the risk of death if infected with Covid-19 is 3.3 times / 230% higher if fully vaccinated compared to being unvaccinated.

The data also shows that 6.5% of hospitalisations among the unvaccinated population have resulted in death, whilst 14% of hospitalisations among the fully vaccinated population have resulted in death. Therefore, the risk of death if hospitalised with Covid-19 is 2.15 times / 115% higher if fully vaccinated compared to being unvaccinated. End Quote (36-39)

Conclusion: Rachelle Walensky of the CDC is now warning us about ADE , Antibody Dependent Enhancement.  Data from Scotland suggests this is now occurring in heavily vaccinated populations. This is an adverse effect in which the vaccine makes the disease worse.  Some authors have suggested abandoning the current mRNA vaccines in favor of new vaccines using T cell immunity rather than antibody immunity.(5)   Dr. Darrell O Ricke writes in Frontiers in immunology (2021):

These models place increased emphasis on the importance of developing safe SARS-CoV-2 T cell vaccines that are not dependent upon antibodies. (5) endquote Dr. Darrell O Ricke

Vaccination is Eighteenth Century Obsolete Technology

If ADE occurs to any extent in the vaccinated population, this could trigger loss of confidence in vaccination.  We would all wake from the hypnotic sleep and realize “vaccination” is an obsolete medical intervention from the eighteenth century, a time before modern medicine with all its knowledge of virology, molecular biology and repurposed drug treatment of viral disease.

The Invention of Vaccination

In the 1700’s, people noticed that milk maids seemed to have immunity from smallpox, thought to be due to exposure to a virus in cows called “cow pox”.  In 1796, Edward Jenner was the first to inject cow pox “pus” into people, naming it “vaccination” from “vacca”, the Latin word for cow.  This was done at a time before the invention of modern medicine, with no understanding of virology or molecular biology, and no modern drugs or therapeutics.

An Obsolete Intervention from the Eighteenth Century

Like the use of bloodletting and leeches, I would propose that vaccination of the eighteenth century has been made obsolete by modern therapeutics. This is especially true for the failed mRNA vaccine program for COVID. (26)  With the advent of modern medicine, we now have highly effective early multi-drug antiviral treatment for COVID 19 with Ivermectin, Hydroxychloroquine, Zinc, Budesonide, Aspirin, Azithromycin, Doxycycline.  These are repurposed drugs used off-label as discussed in previous newsletters. (24-26)

Early Treatment Superior to Vaccination

Early treatment facilitates rapid recovery, resulting in natural immunity more durable and more robust than vaccination.(21)(27-30)  One must ask the question, why submit to an experimental vaccine with new data showing it to be dangerous and ineffective, requiring a “booster” every 6-12 months, when we have a  better approach with highly effective early treatment with multi-drug therapy providing superior natural immunity?  Remember, with Early Treatment using combination of repurposed drugs in sequence, we can completely avoid ADE which increases disease severity upon re-challenge with the virus..

Robert Malone MD Discussing ADE

=============== ================= ============
Below Video is from 5/22/20 (more than a year ago) : The Coronavirus Vaccine Uncensored from “Joni Table Talk” with Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Del Bigtree. May 22, 2020 This is a very clear detailed explanation risks of of ADE with corona virus vaccines.

======================= ================================

Update 8/24/21: FDA Approves Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine ?
=============== ================== =====================
One might wonder how a vaccine could be FDA approved when there were more deaths in the vaccine arm than in the placebo arm. (15 vs. 14)  See this BMJ article by Peter Doshi:

Does the FDA think these data justify the first full approval of a covid-19 vaccine? August 23, 2021  Peter Doshi Associate Editor of the BMJ British Medical Journal writes the FDA should make the data publicly available, and address open questions of efficacy and safety before granting full approval:

“The FDA should demand adequate, controlled studies with long term follow up, and make data publicly available, before granting full approval to covid-19 vaccines…my view, along with a group of around 30 clinicians, scientists, and patient advocates, was that there were simply too many open questions about all covid-19 vaccines to support approving any this year. The preprint has, unfortunately, addressed very few of those open questions, and has raised some new ones…I reiterate our call: “slow down and get the science right—there is no legitimate reason to hurry to grant a license to a coronavirus vaccine….There were 29 total deaths during blinded follow-up (15 in the vaccine arm; 14 in placebo)”. END Quote Peter Doshi BMJ (emphasis mine)

Problem Number 1) Submitted Data shows no lives were saved by the vaccine.  There were more deaths in the vaccine arm than the placebo arm (15 vs. 14)

Problem Number 2) The data submitted to the FDA is outdated data dealing with the earlier Alpha and Beta variants.  The prevailing variant is now the Delta variant for which there was no data submitted.  Israeli data suggests Vaccine efficacy against the Delta variant is in the range of 40%, much lower than earlier variants.

Problem Number 3) The FDA decided to skip input from their advisory committee, and skip any public comment.  This is highly unusual and indicates lack of transparency.

Problem Number 4) “The Shell Game” : Dr. Malone says there were 2 approval letters representing a “shell game”.  Full approval was granted only for the BioNTech labeled product (for ages 16 and up),  While EUA (Emergency Use Authorization) was extended for the Pfizer label product (and the age 12-16).  Aren’t they the same vaccine?  Why the shell game ? The answer can be found HERE and Here.

Update 8/27/21: Israeli study by Gazit shows Natural Immunity is Superior to Two dose vaccination for the Delta Variant. (21)

Comparing SARS-CoV-2 natural immunity to vaccine-induced immunity: reinfections versus breakthrough infections by Sivan Gazit, MD MA1,2*; Roei Shlezinger, BA1; Galit Perez, MN MA2; Roni Lotan,  PhD2; Asaf Peretz, MD1,3; Amir Ben-Tov, MD1,4; Dani Cohen, PhD4; Khitam  Muhsen, PhD4; Gabriel Chodick, PhD MHA2,4; Tal Patalon, MD1,

This study demonstrated that natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger  protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the  Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced  immunity. end quote

HTML Hyperlinks


RSS Feed